Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Don't understand a particular rule or just need to clarify something? This is the forum for you. With 2 of the BBRC members and the main LRB5/6 writer present at TFF, you're bound to get as good an answer as possible.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
Welshy
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:45 am

Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by Welshy »

If this skill is used on a dodge roll and this didge is re-rolled (via TRR or skill) is the -2 modifier applied to the reroll as well?

Reason: ''
Fat_Emrys
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:27 am
Location: Norfolk, UK
Contact:

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by Fat_Emrys »

Yes (and the DT player stays prone even if the reroll is high enough for DT not to affect it).

There's a possibly clearer confirmation here

Reason: ''
BBoing! is NOT bback! - see here for details
SChWiNG - The Society of Chainsaw Wielding Naughty Goblins - needs you!
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by Grumbledook »

Any skill that effects the first roll will effect any rerolls

you can use diving tackle on the second roll even if you didn't use it on the first as well

Reason: ''
User avatar
alternat
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:28 pm
Location: Tilea... er... Skavenblight!

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by alternat »

Grumbledook wrote:you can use diving tackle on the second roll even if you didn't use it on the first as well
and generally you don't, since if you don't DT and the opponent have to use the reroll, this means that the dodge was a failure in itself

Reason: ''
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by Grumbledook »

not sure what you are getting at there saying generally you don't?

Reason: ''
User avatar
alternat
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:28 pm
Location: Tilea... er... Skavenblight!

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by alternat »

Grumbledook wrote:not sure what you are getting at there saying generally you don't?
if I didn't use DT on the fisrt dodge roll, this means that
- I wish to let my opponent go away safe (he made his dodge)
- my opponent fell to the ground (he failed)

in the first case, my opponent most likely won't use his dodge reroll.
in the second, most likely he will, and I can use DT to make him fail again.

Reason: ''
User avatar
duckwing
Emerging Star
Emerging Star
Posts: 411
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:22 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by duckwing »

alternat wrote:
Grumbledook wrote:not sure what you are getting at there saying generally you don't?
if I didn't use DT on the fisrt dodge roll, this means that
- I wish to let my opponent go away safe (he made his dodge)
- my opponent fell to the ground (he failed)

in the first case, my opponent most likely won't use his dodge reroll.
in the second, most likely he will, and I can use DT to make him fail again.
And what do you mean by saying that you generally don't use DT if the opponent uses a RR to roll the dodge roll again?

Reason: ''
Praise Nuffle!
Image
User avatar
alternat
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:28 pm
Location: Tilea... er... Skavenblight!

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by alternat »

duckwing wrote:And what do you mean by saying that you generally don't use DT if the opponent uses a RR to roll the dodge roll again?
oh, com'on... you understood perfectly what I meant.

do you like gamebooks?
ok

1) opponent roll to dodge
- opponent fails, go to 2
- opponent succeeds, go to 4

2) opponent should fall to the ground
- opponent doesn't use a reroll, go to 3
- opponent already used his reroll, go to 3
- opponent uses a reroll, go to 1

3) opponent falls, I roll for armor, maybe injury and possibly casualty. I don't need to use DT. Turnover.

4) I declare DT, go to the ground in his square and opponent adds +2 to the roll needed to dodge
- go to 1

as you can see, I can reach point 4 (use of DT) only if my opponent succeed in his first dodge, or fail and chose to reroll.
if he do it with a skill, or with a TRR, just doesn't matter.

Reason: ''
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by Grumbledook »

i think what you said wasn't clear as a response to what i said

you just confused matters by essentially agreeing with what i put ;]

i disagree with you saying that generally you don't use diving tackle on the first roll, I think that is perhaps where the miscommunication came in as that was what it sounded like you were saying

Reason: ''
User avatar
alternat
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:28 pm
Location: Tilea... er... Skavenblight!

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by alternat »

Grumbledook wrote:i think what you said wasn't clear as a response to what i said

you just confused matters by essentially agreeing with what i put ;]

i disagree with you saying that generally you don't use diving tackle on the first roll, I think that is perhaps where the miscommunication came in as that was what it sounded like you were saying
yes, maybe it could be read as a contradiction, while I was only supporting your statement.

but you'd agree that if you don't use DT on the first roll it is because you don't need to, not because you don't want to. :wink:

Reason: ''
User avatar
duckwing
Emerging Star
Emerging Star
Posts: 411
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:22 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by duckwing »

alternat wrote:
duckwing wrote:And what do you mean by saying that you generally don't use DT if the opponent uses a RR to roll the dodge roll again?
oh, com'on... you understood perfectly what I meant.

do you like gamebooks?
ok

1) opponent roll to dodge
- opponent fails, go to 2
- opponent succeeds, go to 4

2) opponent should fall to the ground
- opponent doesn't use a reroll, go to 3
- opponent already used his reroll, go to 3
- opponent uses a reroll, go to 1

3) opponent falls, I roll for armor, maybe injury and possibly casualty. I don't need to use DT. Turnover.

4) I declare DT, go to the ground in his square and opponent adds +2 to the roll needed to dodge
- go to 1

as you can see, I can reach point 4 (use of DT) only if my opponent succeed in his first dodge, or fail and chose to reroll.
if he do it with a skill, or with a TRR, just doesn't matter.
I did not acutally. This "make your own adventure"-gamebook :lol: only confused me more as to what your point was. But I went back to read your first post, and I think what you mean was that most of the cases where you use DT is when you opponent has already failed a dodge (whithout you needing to use DT) and then re-rolled the dodge (either with a team RR or the skill Dodge). Am I correct?

Not that it matters in the larger scheme of life :P

Reason: ''
Praise Nuffle!
Image
User avatar
alternat
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:28 pm
Location: Tilea... er... Skavenblight!

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by alternat »

duckwing wrote:I think what you mean was that most of the cases where you use DT on a second roll is when your opponent has already failed a dodge (whithout you needing to use DT) and then re-rolled the dodge (either with a team RR or the skill Dodge). Am I correct?
yes, including my fix.
the argument was all about the second roll.
Not that it matters in the larger scheme of life :P
maybe it does for grumbledook... :D

Reason: ''
User avatar
duckwing
Emerging Star
Emerging Star
Posts: 411
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:22 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by duckwing »

alternat wrote:
duckwing wrote:I think what you mean was that most of the cases where you use DT on a second roll is when your opponent has already failed a dodge (whithout you needing to use DT) and then re-rolled the dodge (either with a team RR or the skill Dodge). Am I correct?
yes, including my fix.
the argument was all about the second roll.
Then I understand. I don't agree- I think about half the times you use DT on the second dodge roll is when you used it on the first roll, forcing your opponent to use his re-roll - but unless someone has done a any statistical research in the matter we'll never know :)

Reason: ''
Praise Nuffle!
Image
funnyfingers
Emerging Star
Emerging Star
Posts: 418
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Diving Tackle - some clarification sought

Post by funnyfingers »

I think he is just saying that since you can choose to use DT after seeing the roll, that you don't necessarily need to use DT on the first roll anyway. Though the word generally makes it seems like it is a choice not to use it when in fact it is all up to the dice. You would use DT on a 3 AG dodger's first roll 66% of the time (hardly generally). If you used it you can say it always applies to the second roll.

If you don't use it on the first, you use it 66% of the time for the second.

Again I think the confusion was saying generally like as in a rule of thumb or a suggested tactic.

Reason: ''
Webhosting with the latest version of OBBLM installed: OBBLM Web Hosting (be sure to choose the OBBLM tab)
Post Reply