Foul - Two times double roll for AV and Injury

[kage]

In this "rare" case how to proceed ? My opponent roll double on AV (5+5) and use a Bribe, after that roll for
injury and roll 4+4 ... and he use a second bribe, but he roll 1 ... sent off !!!.

After that he claim that the foul is a single action and he not need to roll the second bribe as he used the first one
and it was successfully ... as other friends looking the match agreed with him I accept, but I need your confirmation.

Thanks for your support.

[dode74]

To reflect this, if the Armour and/or Injury roll is a doubles (i.e.,
two 1s, or two 2s, etc), the referee has spotted the foul, and the
player taking the Foul Action is sent off to the dungeon that lies
under every Blood Bowl pitch.

I'd agree with him that it is a single action. In fact, I'd say the correct sequence is:
1. Roll for AV.
1a. If break then continue to 2.
1b. If no break then continue to 3.
2. Roll for Injury (including cas roll) and deal with it, then continue to 3.
3. If either 1 or 2 were a double then the foul is spotted. Roll to bribe the ref if able and desirable.

[GalakStarscraper]

Dode has it right. The intent is that the Bribe is used after you have rolled both AV and INJ for the Foul.

Tom

[kage]

Ok ! Thank you for your help

[BUBISHI]

I ran across this situation in our league yesterday and had difficulties to explain it to the players.
Could have misunderstood it because I'm not native speaker, so let me explain In my own words, plase:

foul with one bribe

case a.
1. armour-roll: doubles
2. injury roll: no doubles
3. foul action completed.
4. foul spotted by reff because of 1.
5. use of ONE bribe because of 1.

case b.
1. armour-roll: doubles
2. injury roll: doubles
3. foul action completed.
4. foul spotted by reff because of 1. and 2.
5. use of ONE bribe because of 1. and 2.

This means I can cancell the effect of 'player beeing sent off' with ONE bribe, even if I roll TWO doubles (AV + INJURY).

right | wrong ??

[dode74]

Right.