The wholepoint of someone wanting to take allies are basically to fill in where their team and therefore their own gameplay are weak. With regards The 2nd edition Animosity / Dislike rules. You say they work fine. IMO they don't. why would a coach hire a player who there is a certainty that at some point in fact a fair few times in the game he wont pass hand off or interact with oither members of the team. If the guy aint gonna play ball with your team then lets face it you aint gonna hire himRelborn wrote:McDeath :How could you come to such a solution ? As far as I can remember I haven't mentioned my mechanics concerning dislike and animosity. As far as I can say, that the 2nd Edition had such rules and they worked just fine.If dislike and animosity are ruled in re allies then it would almost defeat of picking an ally for the roster with those negatives imposed. Imagine taking on a Dark Elf thrower who won't pass to anyone????
[/quote]Why would you restrict for example an Undead team by having no Throwers in their team, when they can come by this problem by simple add an ally of another race of this position.
[/quote]
The very answer to that question is in the question itself , they "can overcome this problem by simple add an ally of another race in this position". If thats the case why play with undead. Simply play Elves.
or even better create a whole new roster with Elf Throwers, Gutter Runners, Human Blitzers. etc etc etc.
Why should you want to restrict the development of your own team, by hampering it by introducing someone who is going to do more than their share of the work and break the mechanics of the game by making over half you rteam redundant