Undead

manusate · Post by **manusate** » Wed Oct 02, 2002 11:28 pm

I´d like to see some numbers on this subject.

sean newboy · Post by **sean newboy** » Wed Oct 02, 2002 11:47 pm

Um well, i said yes.

Rustycan · Post by **Rustycan** » Wed Oct 02, 2002 11:56 pm

ummmm, well I said no.

Ghost of Pariah · Post by **Ghost of Pariah** » Thu Oct 03, 2002 1:04 am

REPLACED by the 2 new teams NO!
In addition to YES!

Deathwing · Post by **Deathwing** » Thu Oct 03, 2002 1:08 am

I'm totally with Pariah here, there's no reason to scrap the current one other than fluff. Why not 3 variants?

McDeth · Post by **McDeth** » Thu Oct 03, 2002 9:55 am

I Voted no but i'd prefer that if the Necro team does become official that it is in addition to the current Undead roster

shaniepoo · Post by **shaniepoo** » Thu Oct 03, 2002 11:33 am

Said NO, dont realy like the new necro list myself. (only just got me hands on BB3) I dont like the idea of replacing the mummies with golems.

mrinprophet · Post by **mrinprophet** » Thu Oct 03, 2002 3:08 pm

My reason for voting no is on principle. I hate the fact that they are eliminating (or proposing to) a team. A team that I spent a good portion of the allowance my wife gives me on acquiring an 18 player fully painted roster of figs.

Plus, I'm not a big fan of the rosters as proposed, although I like Galak's roster a bit better.

Grumbledook · Post by **Grumbledook** » Thu Oct 03, 2002 3:14 pm

I don't like the fact that they are replaceing the undead, i wouldn't mind however if they were in addition 2.

Haar · Post by **Haar** » Thu Oct 03, 2002 3:45 pm

CowboyNeal!

But seriously folks. I like the updated Necromantic (the one in the MBBL) team better than the published one. If there were three teams: necro, khemri, and vamps, I would be happy. Toss the werewolf in with the vamps instead of undead (really, werewolves are their own thing, but they make more sense with vampires IMO). Give the necro team some blitzer type if they need it to replace the werewolf, just call it something else.

Fenryll · Post by **Fenryll** » Fri Oct 04, 2002 9:23 am

Definitly No for replacing !!

But to have three sorts of undead teams with the normal roster, the khemri and the necro , i will say Yes

Sputnik · Post by **Sputnik** » Fri Oct 04, 2002 11:12 am

no. In addition: yes!

And what might be next? Replace the humans with Bretonians and Nippons?

Sputnik

Longshot · Post by **Longshot** » Fri Oct 04, 2002 8:29 pm

New rules are better IMO, cos 'old' undead were too powerfull..
As this you have the mummy or the ghouls ...(dont tell me about count, i dont like stars.).

Snew · Post by **Snew** » Fri Oct 04, 2002 10:55 pm

In addition to! I'm in the same boat mrinprophet is.

Unlike some on here, I don't think the old team was overpowered. It was tough, to be sure, but not overpowered. I do like the idea of wet and dry undead, but I don't like the 2 rosters we've seen. I could see 3 undead teams, though. The classic, the dry (Kehmri), and the wet (Necromantic for now).

Redfang · Post by **Redfang** » Wed Oct 09, 2002 7:31 am

I voted NO

I really like my Rottingham Raiders. They're finally growing into something.

It would be fun though if I had to replace my old team with a new necromantic one. The mag says I can keep my mummies 'till they die and get golems as well! I guess it might take a while before my mummies die (knock on wood) and until then I will have one helluva team!

R

Talk Fantasy Football

Undead

Do you like the idea of the Undead being replaced by Kehmri and Necromantic teams?

Undead