Page 2 of 2

Re: PETA... seriously?

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:04 pm
by Milo
Madsherman wrote:There's also IMO a huuge difference in getting fur from the industry or getting it from invasive species. Again I highly doubt that the inhabitants of the warhammer universe raises wolves in cages to get their pelts XD
One would assume, then, that there's no problem with wearing Genestealer pelts, since they're pretty much the definition of "invasive species".

Re: PETA... seriously?

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:08 pm
by rolo
My orcs use only free-range squigs!

Re: PETA... seriously?

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:11 pm
by JT-Y
There is a theory that the wolves of Fenris are an invasive species, if they're wolves at all...

Re: PETA... seriously?

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:21 pm
by nazgob
Is it more, or less, appropriate to wear the skin of a sentient creature?

Re: PETA... seriously?

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:32 pm
by JT-Y
As opposed to what, the skin of a brick?

Re: PETA... seriously?

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:55 pm
by lunchmoney
Milo wrote: One would assume, then, that there's no problem with wearing Genestealer pelts, since they're pretty much the definition of "invasive species".
Pretty sure that is what this guy is doing :lol:
Image

Re: PETA... seriously?

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 3:07 pm
by nazgob
Ok, so sentient is the wrong word.

I was thinking of the poor Chaos teams that like to flay their defeated opponents.

Re: PETA... seriously?

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 3:09 pm
by rolo
nazgob wrote:Ok, so sentient is the wrong word.

I was thinking of the poor Chaos teams that like to flay their defeated opponents.
Dwarf Skin uniforms increase your armor.