Underworld change?
Moderator: TFF Mods
- garion
- Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
- Posts: 1687
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:59 pm
Re: Underworld change?
Sooo full terrible roster is here -
0-12 Human linemen - usual stuff+ Animosity
0-1 Human Thrower - usual stuff+ Animosity
0-1 Human Catcher - usual stuff+ Animosity
0-1 Human Blitzer - usual stuff+ Animosity
0-2 Dwarf Blocker - usual stuff+ Loner
0-1 Dwarf Runner - usual stuff + Loner
0-1 Dwarf Slayer - usual stuff + Loner
0-1 Dwarf Blitzer - usual stuff + Loner
0-2 Halfling - usual stuff+ Loner
0-1 Ogre - usual stuff
70k rr
Sadly this roster is awful. nothing fun here. no need to take flings at all because they have loner. Massive wasted opportunity. Hopefully we get a day 2 errata...
0-12 Human linemen - usual stuff+ Animosity
0-1 Human Thrower - usual stuff+ Animosity
0-1 Human Catcher - usual stuff+ Animosity
0-1 Human Blitzer - usual stuff+ Animosity
0-2 Dwarf Blocker - usual stuff+ Loner
0-1 Dwarf Runner - usual stuff + Loner
0-1 Dwarf Slayer - usual stuff + Loner
0-1 Dwarf Blitzer - usual stuff + Loner
0-2 Halfling - usual stuff+ Loner
0-1 Ogre - usual stuff
70k rr
Sadly this roster is awful. nothing fun here. no need to take flings at all because they have loner. Massive wasted opportunity. Hopefully we get a day 2 errata...
Reason: ''
- lunchmoney
- Legend
- Posts: 8879
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Dark Future
Re: Underworld change?
What players were removed? (And not just reduced).Meradanis wrote:So I guess GW lied to us.
Reason: ''
Hired Goon for the NAF (rep for South West England)
lunchmoneybb@gmail.com
TOs! You do not need multiple copies of rosters. It's a waste of paper.
Bribe level: good coffee.
#FlingNation find me on page 95
lunchmoneybb@gmail.com
TOs! You do not need multiple copies of rosters. It's a waste of paper.
Bribe level: good coffee.
#FlingNation find me on page 95
-
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:50 am
Re: Underworld change?
Although, technically Underworld were not actually in the CRP and only officially released during BB2016 and so therefore GW haven't actually lied to us.Meradanis wrote:So I guess GW lied to us.
They never said they wouldn't alter BB2106 rosters
Reason: ''
- Meradanis
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 12:21 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Underworld change?
They removed 1 Blitzer and 1 Thrower. They wrote that "existing collections of miniatures will remain valid". I recently painted my Underworld team and I don't feel like my collection is still valid. I'm missing a lino and a runner and have 2 positional for the trash bin.lunchmoney wrote:What players were removed? (And not just reduced).Meradanis wrote:So I guess GW lied to us.
Reason: ''
-
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:35 pm
- Location: Germany, Ingelheim am Rhein
Re: Underworld change?
Well, actually they've REDUCED the amount of positional players you can take, but they didn't remove them Anyways, it's a smart move companywise, if you want to piss of third party sellers a bit. I don't really care as I'm only a fun player, so it doesn't cause a problem for that kind of playstyle.
Reason: ''
-
- Super Star
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:21 pm
Re: Underworld change?
After seeing how fast third parties adapted to others things... they will sell expansion packs, and add them to current teams, if they see demand. Maybe even design new models and not just reuse previous ones. "Full team, valid for both old and new rosters, all different poses!!!one11eleven"DinoTitanedition wrote:Anyways, it's a smart move companywise, if you want to piss of third party sellers a bit.
Reason: ''
- AllyRdr
- Veteran
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:22 pm
- Location: Near Glasgow, Scotland
Re: Underworld change?
Everything about this has just reinforced my previous belief that GW are a miniatures company who sell games for the figures, not a games company who sell miniatures for their games.
The underworld change and the new alliance roster both feel like they're about capitalising on stuff they had lying around way more than any thought about actual play.
The underworld change and the new alliance roster both feel like they're about capitalising on stuff they had lying around way more than any thought about actual play.
Reason: ''
@AllyRdr - for occasional inane rubbish
- BillyDee
- Star Player
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Sitting in front of a mountain of lead, that ain't gonna paint itself...
Re: Underworld change?
That is literally their business plan:AllyRdr wrote:Everything about this has just reinforced my previous belief that GW are a miniatures company who sell games for the figures, not a games company who sell miniatures for their games.
The underworld change and the new alliance roster both feel like they're about capitalising on stuff they had lying around way more than any thought about actual play.
https://investor.games-workshop.com/our-history/
Reason: ''
"Nobody exists on purpose, nobody belongs anywhere, and everybody’s gonna die. Come watch TV?"
- AllyRdr
- Veteran
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:22 pm
- Location: Near Glasgow, Scotland
Re: Underworld change?
I've never looked at that kind of stuff and was more speaking fron watching them change over time, but that comes as no surprise then that it is indeed their focus.
Shame really.
Shame really.
Reason: ''
@AllyRdr - for occasional inane rubbish
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:13 pm
Re: Underworld change?
The Spike magazine indicates that the gutter runner can gain mutations on a single skill roll. Does this suggest that the roster indicating doubles only is incorrect?
Reason: ''
- AllyRdr
- Veteran
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:22 pm
- Location: Near Glasgow, Scotland
Re: Underworld change?
The Spike magazine has mutations on a double for gutter runners.deanup wrote:The Spike magazine indicates that the gutter runner can gain mutations on a single skill roll. Does this suggest that the roster indicating doubles only is incorrect?
Reason: ''
@AllyRdr - for occasional inane rubbish
- ceetee
- Star Player
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 7:16 pm
- Location: Midsomer Norton, Centre of the Universe
Re: Underworld change?
It does, but twice in the text it implies that Gutter Runners have mutation access on a normal roll.AllyRdr wrote:The Spike magazine has mutations on a double for gutter runners.deanup wrote:The Spike magazine indicates that the gutter runner can gain mutations on a single skill roll. Does this suggest that the roster indicating doubles only is incorrect?
Reason: ''
ct
- Wifflebat
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 5:56 pm
- Location: Ohio, USA
Re: Underworld change?
I was wondering if the strategy articles were written by a non-GW contributor, who may have had an outdated or incomplete version of the team. It may even have been written before the restructuring of the team, then edited to add bits about the Gutter Runners.ceetee wrote:It does, but twice in the text it implies that Gutter Runners have mutation access on a normal roll.AllyRdr wrote:The Spike magazine has mutations on a double for gutter runners.deanup wrote:The Spike magazine indicates that the gutter runner can gain mutations on a single skill roll. Does this suggest that the roster indicating doubles only is incorrect?
Reason: ''
I was Puzzlemonkey, but now I'm Wifflebat. Please forward my mail...
- AllyRdr
- Veteran
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:22 pm
- Location: Near Glasgow, Scotland
Re: Underworld change?
ceetee wrote:It does, but twice in the text it implies that Gutter Runners have mutation access on a normal roll.AllyRdr wrote:The Spike magazine has mutations on a double for gutter runners.deanup wrote:The Spike magazine indicates that the gutter runner can gain mutations on a single skill roll. Does this suggest that the roster indicating doubles only is incorrect?
Ahh right. I had jumped straight to the rosters to look, and not read it all the way fully yet. My bad.
Reason: ''
@AllyRdr - for occasional inane rubbish
-
- Legend
- Posts: 5334
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 8:55 am
- Location: Copenhagen
- Contact:
Re: Underworld change?
Right on the money.AllyRdr wrote:Everything about this has just reinforced my previous belief that GW are a miniatures company who sell games for the figures, not a games company who sell miniatures for their games.
A friend of mine used to work for GW. He says there was/is an explicit in-house saying: "Miniatures before paper rules"
Cheers
Martin
Reason: ''
Narrow Tier BB? http://www.plasmoids.dk/bbowl/NTBB.htm
Or just visit http://www.plasmoids.dk instead
Or just visit http://www.plasmoids.dk instead