https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/skul ... /6580193#/


Moderator: TFF Mods
somehow i knew you were going to be one of the first people respond. hahahaRegash wrote:GG is still on my black list.
I almost posted the same thing... We are a consistent bunch around these parts, ain't we?mikeyc222 wrote:somehow i knew you were going to be one of the first people respond. hahahaRegash wrote:GG is still on my black list.
yeah, i like the concept art and the sculpts that have been shown so far, but i'm going to sit this one out. i spent way too much on BB last year, and i plan on supporting the re-release by buying GW. the budget that i am putting myself on this year will only allow for GW purchases.Wifflebat wrote:I'm just resigned to the fact that not all teams will look right on the field next to one another; there's no way I'm starting over at this point.
That's a plus point in my book.Djay wrote:I will say the one thing I don't like is they're sticking with the smaller scale instead of adjusting with the inflation.
The email thing is the only thing I heard about. I participated in their Green Ratz campaign, and communication was good throughout--they had a lot of minis still to be sculpted even after the campaign, but they were clear about it, sent frequent updates, and delivered a bunch of minis that ended up being a good value. I'm in on this one as well.Darkson wrote:Can someone explain what GG have done (of haven't done) to get in people's bad books? Been burned on a few KS recently so being a little more "buyer beware". (PM is fine if you don't want to off-topic the thread.)
i agree with that. i got my team yesterday. the casts were really sharp and it was a lot of minis for 70 euro as compared to the prices of some other indie teams. (not that i am complaining about those other indie teams. i understand that they can't do the volume that larger companies do in order to get bulk discounts.)Wifflebat wrote:delivered a bunch of minis that ended up being a good value.