Page 2 of 2
Re: I suck at Fummbl
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:55 pm
by Joemanji
Fun is not measured by volume. Some people like to have silent fun.
Re: I suck at Fummbl
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:11 pm
by Sandwich
Heff wrote:Joemanji wrote:One doesn't suck at FUMBBL. One sucks at Blood Bowl. FUMBBL is just harder than most small tabletop groups*, or even tournaments as Swiss can hide you from the strongest opponents. If one wants to not suck one should play more FUMBBL, and more BB in general.
Was noticable at the NAF Champs that the higher uptable you went the less laughter and greater stress there was. Still aiming for a placement in the 20s next year mind.
... which is why last year I was (mostly) giggling away, on the 40K tables ... I think I was table 90+ for games 3-5
(and that with high elves
)
Re: I suck at Fummbl
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:55 am
by Buggrit
Joemanji wrote:If one wants to not suck one should play more FUMBBL, and more BB in general.
Been playing BloodBowl on and off since '87... Still Suck at BloodBowl. Proof that your theory it completely unsound.
Re: I suck at Fummbl
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:24 am
by Glowworm
Joemanji wrote:Fun is not measured by volume. Some people like to have silent fun.
Like Ninja...
Buggrit wrote: Been playing BloodBowl on and off since '87... Still Suck at BloodBowl. Proof that your theory it completely unsound.
So, you've played 1 game a year since '87? 26 games is not that many....
The point is a measure of time is not a measure of volume, which is I think the direction Joemanji is going, so your theory
IS completely unsound....
..and we should all play more BB....
Re: I suck at Fummbl
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:58 pm
by koadah
The League division is the place to be.
Come over to the
145 Club for a more laid back approach.
http://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=group ... group=2922
