Re: Fumbbl/Cyanide Comparison
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:02 pm
If that worked I'd be there far more often!frogboy wrote:I know some people don't like playing side on but if it's a problem then you can always turn your screen sideways
Discuss Fantasy football-style board games - GW's Blood Bowl, Impact!'s Elfball, Privateer Press' Grind, Heresy's Deathball, etc. THIS IS NOT AN NFL FANTASY FOOTBALL SITE!
https://talkfantasyfootball.org/
If that worked I'd be there far more often!frogboy wrote:I know some people don't like playing side on but if it's a problem then you can always turn your screen sideways
That's a shame. Side on is so much better imo, once you get used to it. Also better fits the monitor.dode74 wrote:If that worked I'd be there far more often!frogboy wrote:I know some people don't like playing side on but if it's a problem then you can always turn your screen sideways
They're the lucky ones then, it's still a problem for some people. Someone recently bought it and is having that problemrolo wrote:Took them a long time and several false tries, but nobody in my league has had a net sync error since they announced the fix.
I play TT end on as well, which is probably why I am used to it and found the orientation in Cyanide easier. I find end on makes it easier to play with a "the enemy's gate is down" mindset.WhatBall wrote:That's a shame. Side on is so much better imo, once you get used to it. Also better fits the monitor.
I'd agree with that.I love the clean simplicity of FUMBBL, I can see everything clearly and play it as a tactical board game. I do wish the client was scalable though.
I don't care much about the pitch orientation but the vertical orientation wouldn't fit badly the monitor, since the client is very small compared to an average monitor size.WhatBall wrote: That's a shame. Side on is so much better imo, once you get used to it. Also better fits the monitor.