This one is for Galak.

Got a great idea and/or proposal for BloodBowl?

Moderator: TFF Mods

User avatar
commisar ken
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 8:45 pm
Location: Central Illionis,USA

This one is for Galak.

Post by commisar ken »

On the secret weapons,Why did you do away with the secret weapon rolls?Now it is automatic.I did not mind the rolling and being sent off at the half.That really hurt my Goblins.But you did a great job on updating the teams and Star players.Also to bad Gw would not let you make a Stand alone Players handbook and a star player/League book.Also would it be possible for me to rehash a blood bowl web magazine with out a CnD letter from GW.

Reason: ''
Play Coach Krazy Kenny on Cyanide.He is usually lurking in Auld World.
User avatar
Darkson
Da Spammer
Posts: 24047
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 9:04 pm
Location: The frozen ruins of Felstad
Contact:

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by Darkson »

I can answer the first bit - because it's simpler and fairer*, and because Jervis said so.


(* I'm not saying it's better - I to prefer the SW rolls.)

Reason: ''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
Smurf
mattgslater's court jester
Posts: 1480
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by Smurf »

Some of 3rd ed rules could be borrowed.

IMO we miss the oi ref roll. On a 6 the ref's decision is overturned and on a 1 you the manager is ejected from the game - ie no more calls.

I think they could be used to help problem of illegal stuff in the game. Not everyone can afford bribes etc.

But it gives an off chance, this also means that fouls can be ignored on a 6+. But if you have bribes you must use those first or if you are ejected you cannot use them.

Reason: ''
The Scrumpers (Wood Elf)
Timog (Chaos Dwarves)
Cursed Crypt (Khemri)
Fur Fur Furious (Skaven)
User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by GalakStarscraper »

SW rolls were removed as JJ wanted those rules to be simpler. Neither doubleskulls or I had anything to do with that.

Tom

Reason: ''
Impact! - Fantasy Football miniatures and supplies designed by gamers for gamers
Image
User avatar
commisar ken
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 8:45 pm
Location: Central Illionis,USA

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by commisar ken »

Now i know,He got tired of his team being cut to pieces by goblin chainsaws.I guess in my league i am going back to using 3 rd. edition rules,dice rolling time.Also on the Blood Bowl web mag,i have 200 subscribers to my BB blog.i thoughtit would be fun to rehash the mag for this edition,piks,star player updates,rehash experimental rules.

Reason: ''
Play Coach Krazy Kenny on Cyanide.He is usually lurking in Auld World.
User avatar
DoubleSkulls
Da Admin
Posts: 8219
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Back in the UK
Contact:

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by DoubleSkulls »

SW rolls only applied to stars in LRB4, which were relatively rare. Just sending them off seemed simpler when we allowed them to be rostered players too.

Reason: ''
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
ratimir
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:28 am
Location: Mordenvale, Lochac

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by ratimir »

A thought that crossed my mind the other day:

We've had a more complex system where each weapon had its own penalty roll.
We've had a simple system where there are no penalty rolls and all weapons are either ignored (those without Secret Weapon) or automatically sent off (those with secret weapon).

The reason for the current rules, as Darkson, Galak and DoubleSkulls all mentioned, is that they are simpler, but I think this is one point where simplification has gone too far. It seems bizarre to me that Sinnedbad's sword is as certain to be sent off as a Deathroller, while Rashnak's dagger is equally certain to be overlooked.

How about a middle ground, with three skills:
Secret Weapon: Sent off on a d6 roll of 1 (daggers, stakes, pogo sticks)
Not-So-Secret Weapon: Sent off on a d6 roll of 1-3 (bombs, swords, blunderbusses)
Blatantly Obvious Weapon: Sent off automatically (deathrollers, ball & chain, chainsaws)

Or if that's too complicated, cut it down to two tiers (1-3 and automatic).

Using a system like this, you could also make the star versions a little sneakier or more intimidating than their regular counterparts. Eg, give Secret Weapon to regular Dark Elf Assassins, but not to Horkorn, marking him as an unusually sneaky assassin who does manage to get away with it every time. Or a regular Goblin Looney might have a Blatantly Obvious Weapon, and Nobbla might only have a Not-So-Secret Weapon. Not because Nobbla's actually any less obvious, but because it takes a pretty brave referee to confront Choppy or Rippy.

Reason: ''
"It seems evident that nobody will gain from this strict enforcement of copyright laws, but the SF/F hobbyist will definitely lose." - Ian Livingstone, co-founder of Games Workshop, in White Dwarf Issue 5
Afroman
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:32 am

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by Afroman »

ratimir wrote:A thought that crossed my mind the other day:

We've had a more complex system where each weapon had its own penalty roll.
We've had a simple system where there are no penalty rolls and all weapons are either ignored (those without Secret Weapon) or automatically sent off (those with secret weapon).

The reason for the current rules, as Darkson, Galak and DoubleSkulls all mentioned, is that they are simpler, but I think this is one point where simplification has gone too far. It seems bizarre to me that Sinnedbad's sword is as certain to be sent off as a Deathroller, while Rashnak's dagger is equally certain to be overlooked.

How about a middle ground, with three skills:
Secret Weapon: Sent off on a d6 roll of 1 (daggers, stakes, pogo sticks)
Not-So-Secret Weapon: Sent off on a d6 roll of 1-3 (bombs, swords, blunderbusses)
Blatantly Obvious Weapon: Sent off automatically (deathrollers, ball & chain, chainsaws)

Or if that's too complicated, cut it down to two tiers (1-3 and automatic).

Using a system like this, you could also make the star versions a little sneakier or more intimidating than their regular counterparts. Eg, give Secret Weapon to regular Dark Elf Assassins, but not to Horkorn, marking him as an unusually sneaky assassin who does manage to get away with it every time. Or a regular Goblin Looney might have a Blatantly Obvious Weapon, and Nobbla might only have a Not-So-Secret Weapon. Not because Nobbla's actually any less obvious, but because it takes a pretty brave referee to confront Choppy or Rippy.
I like this Idea, it feels very Blood Bowl.

+1

Reason: ''
User avatar
Tourach
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:57 am
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by Tourach »

I actually like the veapon rules are ok, I do think bribes should be automatic on weapons though.

Reason: ''
I DO want some cheese with my whine.
A.k.a MissSweden
User avatar
Bludbowler
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 1:06 pm
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by Bludbowler »

If Secret Weapons are supposed to be "against the rules," then treat each use of a Secret Weapon as if it were a Foul attempt. That way it's purely random as to when the SW is removed from the game. Throw the IGMEOY rule back in, along with "Argue The Call," and we're talking all sorts of wacky fun!

:)

Reason: ''
User avatar
mattgslater
King of Comedy
Posts: 7758
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:18 pm
Location: Far to the west, across the great desert, in the fabled Land of Comedy

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by mattgslater »

I've been grappling with this:

If Secret Weapon were a 4+ to stay after the first drive, what would the cost mod be like?

I really like the Saw and B&C stars as is, but I think the rostered SWs and Sinnedbad suffer overmuch and would rather see them go up in price.

In the case of the Deathroller, I don't mind seeing it for just one drive, but it should probably be cheaper, no? It would be a great equalizer against the bash teams that beat them up, if it could carry its TV weight.

Reason: ''
What is Nuffle's view? Through a window, two-by-three. He peers through snake eyes.
What is Nuffle's lawn? Inches, squares, and tackle zones: Reddened blades of grass.
What is Nuffle's tree? Risk its trunk, space the branches. Touchdowns are its fruit.
Smurf
mattgslater's court jester
Posts: 1480
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by Smurf »

I try and ask my league to 'oi ref' from the 3rd ed.

I like the outside chance of someone getting carded to have the coach argue the call.

Reason: ''
The Scrumpers (Wood Elf)
Timog (Chaos Dwarves)
Cursed Crypt (Khemri)
Fur Fur Furious (Skaven)
User avatar
mattgslater
King of Comedy
Posts: 7758
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:18 pm
Location: Far to the west, across the great desert, in the fabled Land of Comedy

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by mattgslater »

Smurf wrote:I try and ask my league to 'oi ref' from the 3rd ed.

I like the outside chance of someone getting carded to have the coach argue the call.
We do something similar. We make foul Cas (and Saw, Stab, and surf Cas) worth 1SPP, but we have a Penalty roll when a player is caught fouling.

1: Warning. Turnover, no ejection.
2-5: Ejection.
6: Ejection, plus suspension for 1 match.

Reason: ''
What is Nuffle's view? Through a window, two-by-three. He peers through snake eyes.
What is Nuffle's lawn? Inches, squares, and tackle zones: Reddened blades of grass.
What is Nuffle's tree? Risk its trunk, space the branches. Touchdowns are its fruit.
User avatar
tchatter
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 3:44 am
Location: Salisbury, MD USA

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by tchatter »

I don't mind the SW = automatic ejection so much. I liked the old rules better, but I can live with the change. However, there does need to be a slight tweak to Secret Weapon players: "Players with Secret Weapons do not have to setup for a drive, even if this would leave the team with less than 11 players on the pitch."

Having your opponent score on turn 7 of the first half (and you only had your bomber on the pitch), and you find yourself having to setup your Fanatic and Looney for 1 or 2 turns. SUCKS. Now you get to enter the 2nd half way undermanned and all your weapons are gone.

That is the part where the new rule really HURTS.

Reason: ''
FUMBBL Coach name: tchatter
Ex-Commish of REBBL
Image
Image
Nikolai II
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:27 pm

Re: This one is for Galak.

Post by Nikolai II »

Bludbowler wrote:If Secret Weapons are supposed to be "against the rules," then treat each use of a Secret Weapon as if it were a Foul attempt. That way it's purely random as to when the SW is removed from the game. Throw the IGMEOY rule back in, along with "Argue The Call," and we're talking all sorts of wacky fun!

:)
Might make it go away faster, especially bombardiers - but I do really like the idea of using the same rules for foul sendoffs as for secret weapons. (Whichever rules they become) :)

Reason: ''
Post Reply