Of course I prefer to play with painted figs on board but PBEM BB is still BB.
So why not a mixed ranking which take in consideration normal tournament and electronic tournament ?
Guys Make love instead making war

Moderator: TFF Mods
Not yetZombie wrote: Toby, quit it, will you?
Starcraft is a strategy game first of all, just like bloodbowl. It is the best real time strategy game ever, just like blood bowl is the best turn based strategy game ever. You cant bring Starcraft to a tabletop board without changing the gameplay significantly, unlike Blood Bowl that could be played both ways, on and offline with the same ruleset and depth. Choosing the best existing online strategy game for comparison is the only way to go. The standard is set to a high level but Blood Bowl could achieve that as well.Zombie wrote: First of all, Stacraft is the only game with that kind of support. Choosing that computer game as an example isn't fair.
Very well we are here to discuss a Game first of all. Its freaking regardless on what platform it is played. Chess for example is 100% the same game on and offline. Both plattforms have their specific advantages, of course. For example online play is the only possibility to play and therefore rank players world wide without traveling.Zombie wrote: Second, NOBODY HERE CARES ABOUT FREAKING COMPUTER GAMES. We're here to discuss a board game, got it?
The only issue with maphack is people accusing each other of using it. As you can record games and watch the match in replay later it is hard to take any advantage of the hack. Maphack was never an real issue in pro gaming. Matches are observed by refrees who see the whole map. They can ask players for screenshots at any time which must be sent via icq within 20 seconds. Big Tournaments are played on local networks on tournament PCs. A lot of people use Maphack on b.net, thats correct, but it doesnt help them to become competitive. As for Blood Bowl things would be more complicated than simply revealing the playing field...Zombie wrote: Third, it's interesting that you mention Starcraft rankings and cheating in the same post, as it's well known that 90% of the highest ranked players on Battlenet are map hackers. Of course, having been one of them, you'll deny it, but it remains true nonetheless.
Thats fine.Zombie wrote: Fourth, you can't cheat in organized board game tournaments like you can in computer games. And no, you can't bring anything but a rookie team. Unless they accept teams from former sanctioned tournaments, but in that case, they'll still check your roster very carefully for sure.
We will see.Zombie wrote: Fifth, Blood Bowl is actually getting to be one of the best organized board games that i know of. That ain't a small feat.
I return that complimentZombie wrote: Sixth, oh well, there are so many things wrong in your post, i don't know what to talk about next.
Did you know that in the credits of WarCraft 3 there is a Blood Bowl game between Orcs and Humans ?Zombie wrote: Remember, BLOOD BOWL IS A BOARD GAME. How is that so hard to understand? And what do you think it will accomplish to repeat the same thing a thousand time? You want an online game, we don't. Accept that you lost and go with the majority.
Trambi wrote: Blood Bowl is a game before beeing a board game.
Of course I prefer to play with painted figs on board but PBEM BB is still BB.
So why not a mixed ranking which take in consideration normal tournament and electronic tournament ?
That is so not true. The depth you can achieve online is nowhere near what you have in real life, because you lose 99% of the interaction with the other person. If you can't see that, the loss is yours.on and offline with the same ruleset and depth