Page 1 of 4
Which Catcher do you prefer for the Pro Elf team?
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 6:55 pm
by Balrog
The choice is simple, do you prefer Catcher A or Catcher B for the new Pro Elves?
Catcher A
Code: Select all
# Position Cost MA ST AG AV Skills & Traits Skills Available
0-4 Catcher 100,000 8 3 4 7 Catch, Nerves of Steel General, Agility
Catcher B
Code: Select all
# Position Cost MA ST AG AV Skills & Traits Skills Available
0-4 Catcher 100,000 8 3 4 7 Catch, Leap General, Agility
For more info, please read
The New Elf Team thread.
-Balrog
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 6:57 pm
by Zombie
I prefer catcher A, if he either loses 1MA, loses catch or increases in cost by 10k.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 7:00 pm
by Munkey
I much prefer catcher A, i'm not sure whether he needs to cost more but if he does I could live with it. I wouldn't like to see him lose an MA though.
BTW, any chance of a poll on this thread?
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 7:00 pm
by ZanzerTem
I agree with Zombie 100%.
I don't like Catchers that start with Leap, but I like the NoS Catchers IF they are properly adjusted elsewhere.
But, according to the BBRC, we don't have a choice in the matter. They are the ones who make all the rules, fair or unfair, balanced or unbalanced. (And yes, I said that spitefully)
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 7:11 pm
by Khar-peth
catcher A no hesitation but -1MA or +10k
catcher B brings less flavour...
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 7:47 pm
by Balrog
Sorry about the double Poll, something got screwed up in the edit.
-Balrog
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 8:54 pm
by Grumbledook
i perfer catcher a but i think nos is too powerful for an ag4 catcher to start with, hence i like a
so i voted b cause i would rather have the team balenced
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 9:50 pm
by Balrog
Grumbledook wrote:i perfer catcher a but i think nos is too powerful for an ag4 catcher to start with, hence i like a
so i voted b cause i would rather have the team balenced
Would you think a Wardancer was balanced if we submitted it now? Probably not, so I think the Catcher is fine, and with 6 positional players costing 100k+ it'll take them a while to get them all.
-Balrog
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 9:54 pm
by Grumbledook
blodge is easier to deal with then nerves of steel, cause if you don't get them down then well still going to have those -1s to catch for every player you mark them with
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 10:04 pm
by Dave
true, but it still takes some time for this guy to get blodge..
like a more, hasn't been done before..
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 10:10 pm
by Grumbledook
catch and leap hasn't been done before either
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 10:11 pm
by Balrog
Grumbledook wrote:catch and leap hasn't been done before either
Yeah, but it's a lot easier to do, a HE catcher needs only 1 skill to get there. I dunno, I just think the NoS catcher would be good, but not overpowered, I wish I could start playtesting this...
-Balrog
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 10:12 pm
by Grumbledook
whats stopping you ;]
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 10:14 pm
by Dave
all the killing that happens to my teams ??
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 12:18 am
by Darkson
Perfer a)
Take the Catch skill away would be better (yeah, I know, catcher without catch skill, so what? We have blockers without the block skill already.)