Your views on the Swiss System

Discuss teams, ride/hotel sharing, trash talk, and event results here

Moderators: lunchmoney, TFF Mods

Your views on the Swiss system

I really like the Swiss system, it's the bomb!
13
24%
Swiss works the best for BB
29
54%
Swiss is OK, but I'd try something different.
12
22%
I'd really like to have something different.
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 54

User avatar
daloonieshaman
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:58 pm
Location: Pasadena California
Contact:

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by daloonieshaman »

The problem with Swiss is it is to easy to back door the overall.
A loss or tie puts you in a different bracket from the top winners until the final round or 2.

Reason: ''
Image
2014 Chaos Cup Stunty Cup
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by Grumbledook »

I think that is a good thing in these circumstances personally

you can simply avoid it by having the top two after the final round playing a final though, I personally prefer just playing swiss the whole way

makes it more exciting for more people in the last game

Reason: ''
frikipe
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:20 pm

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by frikipe »

The swiss is the best scoring system to me, the really problem is the tiebreak most tournaments use, TD and Cas. systems are horrible, the best tiebreak is the traditional "opponents score" used in the chess tourneys, the only problem for this tiebreak is the drops of the players if a player drops at round 2-3 ruins the tiebreak of his previous oponents, but this culd be fixed using all the oppo results except the worse.

Reason: ''
[color=red][size=150]I'M NAF[/color]
[color=blue]MY WIFE TOO[/color][/size]
[color=green]AND MY DOG TOO[/color]
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/frikipe/IMAG0008.jpg[/img]
Lychanthrope
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 1051
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Bristol, Indiana

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by Lychanthrope »

The problem, and I think it's one we're just going to have to live with, is that it's not chess. We aren't playing the same team. Not all teams have an equal ability to score/cause injury. Not the team you play or the team you play agianst. Any points or tie breakers are going to be the advantage of one team or another.

Reason: ''
Image
User avatar
Banelord
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by Banelord »

The swiss is the best scoring system to me, the really problem is the tiebreak most tournaments use, TD and Cas. systems are horrible, the best tiebreak is the traditional "opponents score" used in the chess tourneys, the only problem for this tiebreak is the drops of the players if a player drops at round 2-3 ruins the tiebreak of his previous oponents, but this culd be fixed using all the oppo results except the worse.
Exactly, swiss is fine! But as tie-breaker only "opponent score" is really fair.

Reason: ''
Come to the Baden Basho!
SierraKiloBravo
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:34 pm
Location: California Lovin'

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by SierraKiloBravo »

Banelord wrote:
The swiss is the best scoring system to me, the really problem is the tiebreak most tournaments use, TD and Cas. systems are horrible, the best tiebreak is the traditional "opponents score" used in the chess tourneys, the only problem for this tiebreak is the drops of the players if a player drops at round 2-3 ruins the tiebreak of his previous oponents, but this culd be fixed using all the oppo results except the worse.
Exactly, swiss is fine! But as tie-breaker only "opponent score" is really fair.
What do you mean by "opponent score"? Looking at the total TDs scored for two tied coaches?

Reason: ''
Control the lightning.
User avatar
Joemanji
Power Gamer
Posts: 9508
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 3:08 pm
Location: ECBBL, London, England

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by Joemanji »

No the total tournament points. Assuming 3 for a win: if you win, win, lose you'll play coaches with 0,3,6,6 = 15 points. But if you lose, win, win you'll play coaches with 0,0,3,6 = 9 points. Both coaches will have 6 points themselves The first coach has played harder opponents so his tiebreaker is better.

Reason: ''
*This post may have been made without the use of a hat.
User avatar
mubo
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 749
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:12 pm
Location: Oxford, UK

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by mubo »

Joemanji wrote:No the total tournament points. Assuming 3 for a win: if you win, win, lose you'll play coaches with 0,3,6,6 = 15 points. But if you lose, win, win you'll play coaches with 0,0,3,6 = 9 points. Both coaches will have 6 points themselves The first coach has played harder opponents so his tiebreaker is better.
Not necessarily, agree more likely to have played better opponents, but frequently happens that two top coaches play in the first round.

I see the logic, but doesn't always work.

Reason: ''
Glicko guy.
Team England committee member
User avatar
PeteW
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 1150
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by PeteW »

At the WISB, we ran swiss (3-1-0) with no bonus points and a random draw after tournament points. It was quite nice as you couldn't work out who exactly you would have next round.

For the final scores it went to TD difference, but as the overall winner was on his own with 16 tourny points the tiebreaker didn't matter till you got to 3rd place.

Reason: ''
NAFC 2014. Glowworm: "PeteW is definitely hotter than Lunchmoney."
Image
User avatar
mubo
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 749
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:12 pm
Location: Oxford, UK

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by mubo »

PeteW wrote:At the WISB, we ran swiss (3-1-0) with no bonus points and a random draw after tournament points. It was quite nice as you couldn't work out who exactly you would have next round.

For the final scores it went to TD difference, but as the overall winner was on his own with 16 tourny points the tiebreaker didn't matter till you got to 3rd place.
I think this is a much better system. I'd like to see more tourneys use it.

Reason: ''
Glicko guy.
Team England committee member
User avatar
Joemanji
Power Gamer
Posts: 9508
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 3:08 pm
Location: ECBBL, London, England

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by Joemanji »

Ironmanj will be using this (if Leon agrees).

Reason: ''
*This post may have been made without the use of a hat.
User avatar
mubo
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 749
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:12 pm
Location: Oxford, UK

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by mubo »

I herald this news muchly!

Reason: ''
Glicko guy.
Team England committee member
User avatar
stick_with_poo_on_the_end
has a big box
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Geordie Wonderland (Used to work in Leicester)

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by stick_with_poo_on_the_end »

poo bowl will use it to!

Reason: ''
Word to Your Mother.
User avatar
Joemanji
Power Gamer
Posts: 9508
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 3:08 pm
Location: ECBBL, London, England

Re: Your views on the Swiss System

Post by Joemanji »

\o/

Not only does it mix up coaches, it mixes up races. Robin (Blocknroll) said before our game that he rarely gets to face WEs and the likes because of the TD difference thing. Very interesting, and more varied games can only be a good thing.

Reason: ''
*This post may have been made without the use of a hat.
Post Reply