I know for Team Denmark the Bonus skills meant we had a Vampire team.
Any one with feedback on the bonus skills plz feel free to post
![:)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Moderators: lunchmoney, TFF Mods
Me too.Elyoukey wrote: changing the double for 2 skills on the same player and 1 more skill for tier 2 teams would have changed my mind i think.
Hmm this is an interesting idea.Elyoukey wrote:I think the opportunity to stack skills is more important for tier 2+ rosters because the problem of those roster is often that their players need to skillup to become playable. for chaos for exemple a block CW is not really better than a block saurus. but a block-claw CW make the team significativelly better i think (i actually never played chaos in 110 tourneys)
For pro elves or high elves also it is a good thing but not broken to have 3 blodgers
for slanns, a wrestle-stripball blitzer will also make the change they need, more than a guard lineman or a block kroxigor.
if we are speaking about a hardcore competition "playable" is not enough i think for people to change their mind. as stated if i was playing individual i would probably have played proelves because the 1 skill make them "fun" playable, but let them in the tier 2 box. ie you cannot beat a good undead coach with 1 more skill on the pro elves roster, you need something more significant (luck can do the trick, but cannot be controlled).Topper wrote:because they were supposed to make them playable not better than the others.
Elyoukey wrote:a team of 24 players would then be the optimum, but i guess most countries could not find them.
^^ This.mepmuff wrote:Imbalance is fine IMHO and I hope Ultimate Tier-Balance is something eurobowl will never strive for.
Hmm okay - though you guys helped us play test it at the DanishOpen and said it was far from too powerfulJoemanji wrote:^^ This.mepmuff wrote:Imbalance is fine IMHO and I hope Ultimate Tier-Balance is something eurobowl will never strive for.
IMO Eurobowl is not the place to gamble on attempting to 'balance' races. It is about proper Blood Bowl. I would hate to get to the point where the nation that won was the one that best adapted to the tiering system.
I am also uncomfortable with Vampires having two extra skills. We've had a lot of tiered tournaments in the UK and have definitely had problems with people underrating Vampires and giving them too many skills.
In total agreement here. Eurobowl isn't about being fruity, it's about proper BB. Trying to add 'balance' is a road that would spoil things, IMO. The less additional skills / 'mixing it up' for teams, the better. You've the whole of the rest of the year for all of that stuff.Joemanji wrote:^^ This.mepmuff wrote:Imbalance is fine IMHO and I hope Ultimate Tier-Balance is something eurobowl will never strive for.
IMO Eurobowl is not the place to gamble on attempting to 'balance' races. It is about proper Blood Bowl. I would hate to get to the point where the nation that won was the one that best adapted to the tiering system.
I am also uncomfortable with Vampires having two extra skills. We've had a lot of tiered tournaments in the UK and have definitely had problems with people underrating Vampires and giving them too many skills.