Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
Moderator: TFF Mods
- MacHurto
- Veteran
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2016 11:22 am
Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
Couple of questions:
1) if a player wants to retire and you pay him extra money to stay... Does he roll again at the end of the next season or he still wants to retire by default? I would guess it is the second one?
2) Given expensive mistakes... What is the "optimal" value for the treasury now? Below 200k?
1) if a player wants to retire and you pay him extra money to stay... Does he roll again at the end of the next season or he still wants to retire by default? I would guess it is the second one?
2) Given expensive mistakes... What is the "optimal" value for the treasury now? Below 200k?
Reason: ''
-
- Ex-Cyanide/Focus toadie
- Posts: 2565
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:55 pm
- Location: Near Reading, UK
Re: Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
1. I think the second. Once a player wants to retire there's no procedure for removing the tick from the box.
2. I think <300k. A 1 in 6 to drop half the cash (Major Incident) is a reasonable risk, and if you stay above 250 you're only a few matches or so from being back above 200 again. You'll drop to a similar level as you would if you tried to stay in the 150-190 range and got hit with a Minor Incident anyway, and gives you a 5/6 chance of retaining that 100k+ buffer. I don't think the 1/6 risk of potentially losing almost everything is worth going to 300k for.
2. I think <300k. A 1 in 6 to drop half the cash (Major Incident) is a reasonable risk, and if you stay above 250 you're only a few matches or so from being back above 200 again. You'll drop to a similar level as you would if you tried to stay in the 150-190 range and got hit with a Minor Incident anyway, and gives you a 5/6 chance of retaining that 100k+ buffer. I don't think the 1/6 risk of potentially losing almost everything is worth going to 300k for.
Reason: ''
- MacHurto
- Veteran
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2016 11:22 am
Re: Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
Thanks, Dode. It also makes sense to try and keep treasury as high as possible at the end of the season.
Can you waste money? Like hire and immediately fire cheerleaders. It happens before the expensive mistakes roll
Can you waste money? Like hire and immediately fire cheerleaders. It happens before the expensive mistakes roll
Reason: ''
-
- Experienced
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:44 am
Re: Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
Not having Deathzone, only read through it so i have to go after from what i remember. Not sure when the roll is made exactly, my formula is based on that it is that you can spend the last winnings before rolling for expensive mistakes. How the table looks also comes from my memory.
Then the optimal cash in the end of the season is when average winnings= average losses so it becomes simple formulas c=a+b*x or x=(c-a)/b for each intervall of cash where x is treasury. This is because some of the losses due to expensive mistakes are fixed and some depends on the treasury. The logic is that at the end of season you don't need to think about spending money replacing lost players. You also have to estimate the outcome of match and the expected fame but i have just simplified it ny making fixed estimations. The formula doesn't take SE into account.
My result is that in the 200-290 k intervall the optimal treasury is 505 k and in the 300-390 k intervall the optimal treasury is 210k. Even you if you think the win estimation is much higher than my mine the optimum cash is 290k (to avoid the 300-390k column). All given i have guessed how expensive mistake works and the expensive mistakes table right.
Then the optimal cash in the end of the season is when average winnings= average losses so it becomes simple formulas c=a+b*x or x=(c-a)/b for each intervall of cash where x is treasury. This is because some of the losses due to expensive mistakes are fixed and some depends on the treasury. The logic is that at the end of season you don't need to think about spending money replacing lost players. You also have to estimate the outcome of match and the expected fame but i have just simplified it ny making fixed estimations. The formula doesn't take SE into account.
My result is that in the 200-290 k intervall the optimal treasury is 505 k and in the 300-390 k intervall the optimal treasury is 210k. Even you if you think the win estimation is much higher than my mine the optimum cash is 290k (to avoid the 300-390k column). All given i have guessed how expensive mistake works and the expensive mistakes table right.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Reason: ''
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:35 am
Re: Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
I think teams will want to hold to 190k to start with until they get a big win to put them above 250k and then try and stay at 250-290k. As you get to spend money before mistakes are rolled you can buy the 100k replacement player and stay under 200k.MacHurto wrote:Couple of questions:
2) Given expensive mistakes... What is the "optimal" value for the treasury now? Below 200k?
Step 4 of post match just says hire and fire. Rules do not actually prohibit you from hiring and firing the same player/staff but some commisioners think it should not be allowed.MacHurto wrote:Can you waste money? Like hire and immediately fire cheerleaders. It happens before the expensive mistakes roll
If you are not allowed to waste cash they just buy beer or a bribe/apo at the start of a match to burn the cash. At least with this edition rules cash spent does not add to TV.
Reason: ''
- Bakunin
- Star Player
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:39 am
- Location: Norsca
Re: Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
MacHurto wrote:Couple of questions:
1) if a player wants to retire and you pay him extra money to stay... Does he roll again at the end of the next season or he still wants to retire by default?
Well you are making a new roster right? So i would think you should roll each season to see if a players want to retire. (A lot can happen in a season fluff wise)
Reason: ''
Galak 3:16 says "There is a point in time that a player really should read the rulebook."
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:50 am
Re: Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
Not quite. You make a new Cockerel but you can choose to recruite players from your old team, and they keep all their stats.Bakunin wrote:MacHurto wrote:Couple of questions:
1) if a player wants to retire and you pay him extra money to stay... Does he roll again at the end of the next season or he still wants to retire by default?
Well you are making a new roster right? So i would think you should roll each season to see if a players want to retire. (A lot can happen in a season fluff wise)
Reason: ''
-
- Experienced
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 3:42 pm
Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
I missed that bit in the rules. Reckon it'll get errata'd?Kemimutt wrote: You make a new Cockerel
Sent from my XT1039 using Tapatalk
Reason: ''
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:50 am
Re: Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
I dont know where that came from!hutchinsfairy wrote:I missed that bit in the rules. Reckon it'll get errata'd?Kemimutt wrote: You make a new Cockerel
Sent from my XT1039 using Tapatalk
Reason: ''
-
- Ex-Cyanide/Focus toadie
- Posts: 2565
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:55 pm
- Location: Near Reading, UK
Re: Retiring players and Treasury optimal value
I thought it was a (quite funny, actually) reference to the common use of the word "Cockerel" instead of "roster".Kemimutt wrote:I dont know where that came from!
Reason: ''