Necromancy Team Observations

gken1 · Post by **gken1** » Tue Jun 10, 2003 8:54 am

Just like in pro-football. speed kills. Werewolves can develop alot quicker than other players because they can get spp's quickly from scoring (MA8) and injuries...those RSC's. They will probably have 3 skill increases by the time most players are getting their first. With three skill increases considering no doubles you get...frenzy, Rsc, block, dodge, catch and tackle or piling on. It's easy to maneuver zombies or wights or ghouls into position to protect the werewolves. and the Flesh golems are great damage sponges.

Ken

Indigo · Post by **Indigo** » Tue Jun 10, 2003 9:24 am

IMO the werewolf is far too powerful.

I tried knocking him down to AG2 and it seemed to bring him back under control, but I like the idea of giving him wild animal too.

Post by **GalakStarscraper** » Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:29 pm

I'll stay out of this discussion.

I hate and despise the current Annual Necro roster.

The one the BBRC had the MBBL test is balanced and is generally liked by the league and the coaches playing the team. Also, the Werewolf in the MBBL test team looks a heck of a lot more like the fig than the one in the Annual.

However, I have this feeling like it won't get the time of day.

I'm actually switching gears anymore ... lobby for the old Undead team and the MBBL Necro to be in the game.

Galak

Marcus · Post by **Marcus** » Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:32 pm

Where would I find both rosters? Haven't got my annual with me here....

Post by **DoubleSkulls** » Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:40 pm

Marcus wrote:Where would I find both rosters? Haven't got my annual with me here....

I think Galak has the official ones on www.midgardbb.com, regardless I'll bring the annual in next week and you can have a look through.

Deathwing · Post by **Deathwing** » Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:42 pm

Annual version:
0-12 Zombies
0-2 Ghouls
0-4 Wights
(All as per Undead)
0-2 Flesh Golem 120k 4 4 2 9 Stand Firm, Regen, Thick Sk.
0-2 Werewolf 120K 8 3 3 8 Catch, Frenzy, RSF.

Post by **Dave** » Tue Jun 10, 2003 7:37 pm

I like this roster more than the first one, but it is far from perfect. 0-2 Wights could be a good start, and perhaps kinda different Were's