Talk Fantasy Football

Tojurub wrote:0.) Great turnout. Thank you membership.
1.) The NAF has not decided anything yet.
2.) There will be a NAF committee meeting soon were we wil discuss this voting

@ Frogboy: with all due respect, but that is one of the dumbest thing I ever heard in combination with elections. So if somebody turns 18 and is allowed to vote for the first time, you will forbid that, because they are "new"? Just for your info, only two dozen people have joined the NAF since September 16

Could have just said there have only been 2 dozen new members join, i said i was interested. As it only effects NAF events makes sence to me that members should have priority. Suggest you keep your opinion about who you think is dumb to yourself!

Knob

I was referring to this:

frogboy wrote: Can we have a rule and something in place next time to only allow excisting members to vote on important issues please?

Thank you for your suggestion, but I think there is no rule in this forum to restrict free speech, is there? And for the record: I have never written anything about anybody being dumb?

Tojurub wrote: Just for your info, only two dozen people have joined the NAF since September 16

I've done about near half of that in my local area!

More details here: https://www.thenaf.net/2017/10/new-races-result/

Tojurub wrote:Just for your info, only two dozen people have joined the NAF since September 16

Erm, might do a factcheck on this one...

Meh

Well i was totally against change before, preferring that we could stick to whatever Games Workshop provide us with, since we need a head, due to them being back in charge.

Seems the vote shows more people who voted (still less than 50% of the membership) would prefer to make our own path.

But now i just couldn't give a ratz arse. Except for maybe meeting a Bretonian team at a tournement. Whats their counter again?
All that grab and gaurd and wrestle, its discusting!

But i will support the NAF at my tournement whatever they decide, infact if it gives someone incentive to play who otherwise wouldn't then that is a good thing. Like a dirty gateway drug. Soon they'll be a snivelling mess on the bottom tables throwing halflings with a 50% chance of success...

Now, where did i leave my shrooms? Go go go

Tojurub wrote:@Darkson: you said someting similar when LRB5 came out

Not about tournaments I didn't.

@Torjurub

True, I'm not interested in the tournament scene nor a NAF membership.
(The later would be senseless without the former, in my opinion!)

All I said was to explain what I think was the answer to a question that had been asked.

sann0638 wrote:

Tojurub wrote:Just for your info, only two dozen people have joined the NAF since September 16

Erm, might do a factcheck on this one...

I did.... unless I miscounted or the system tricked me... I did only count new member with numbers higher than 24000.

I think 22650 was Sept 16, and we're on 24636 now.

no, that's not correct. you looked in the membership list with the expiring date. This is misleading.

I signed up somebody in mid August and he got the number 24395


There were 30 votes from people who signed up in the entire month of September according to the voting tool.

And before somebody wonders: no, we can't see who voted for what.

Blood Bowl 2 and now (maybe) the NAF, Plasmoid is doing well getting their teams into Blood Bowl proper!

One out of four of their teams getting in is pretty good for fan rosters (going by the homemade teams they designed): http://plasmoids.dk/HomeTeams.doc

I guess my "September 16" statement might have been misleading... I did not mean September 2016, but the 16th day of September 2017 (the day the voting started)

So Next question.
Once these have been abandoned by the computer games, when do we vote to remove them?

What, you mean like Khorne is now?