The Duel decision - hurrah! Forgive my previous bleating but prior to your glorious puissant reign of the NAFC the organisers allowed a serious painter, who knew full well what he was doing, to break the rules to his advantage.hawca wrote:Ok
The duel.
The rules say 60mm
This is to stop people doing overly large and the paint job becoming second to the painting.
As for previous events this is my first planned and run solely by me. When I ran out last years. In both cases this rule has been met and needs to for this competition.
The argue the ref does say once in a game.
It's basically a crap bribe
Argue the Call - the rules do not say once per game (I have appended them to this post) so is this a specific NAFC rule as I cannot see it in the rule pack? It is worth noting that the rules do state that you need a Head Coach figure (representing you!) to 'Argue the Call'. Mike Davies, NAF has clarified that the NAF do not require a Head Coach figure to 'Argue the Call' this is up to the TO.
NOTES
A Head Coach can ‘Argue the Call’ on a sending off (DZ1 page 38 Coaching Staff):
Head Coach
This model represents you, and so does not cost any gold to hire for the team. During a match, your main job is to yell and shout at the players in your team in order to inspire them and, more importantly, to yell and shout at the referee if they make a call against your team. If you have a suitable miniature representing your Head Coach, you can argue the call when one of your players is sent off for committing a foul or using a Secret Weapon. Roll D6. On a roll of 6, the referee accepts your argument (or, at the very least, believes your thinly-veiled threats) and the player in question is only sent to the Reserves box instead of being sent off entirely. On a roll of 1, the referee has had enough of your lip and ejects you from the game! Remove your Head Coach from the Dugout. For the rest of the game you cannot argue any calls, and if the ‘Brilliant Coaching’ result is rolled on the Kick-off table, subtract 1 from your dice roll.
PS Having reread the rules I can now see that poor rule writing has left ambiguity in this section: Does the last sentence refer to the previous sentence "On a roll of 1," or to the paragraph as a whole, i.e. Do you remove your Head Coach on a roll of 1 or for arguing the call in the first place? Who do we approach for a rule clarification as the only clarification so far to this section is: Add the following to the end of the paragraph: “Note that if the call is successfully argued and the player is sent to the Reserves box, a Turnover is still caused.”