Non WFB fluff Woodies
Moderator: TFF Mods
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2003 9:11 pm
- Location: C8P
I think the only thing the treeman does is save some elves from dying (and save them some turn from dodging away from Krox and stuff like that)
But if you use him for anything other than that the Treeman is just a useless pile of wood. You can outrunn him with EVERYTHING (exept mummies and -1mv Dwarfs)
My best friend has a pretty decent WE team and he uses his Treeman for defence only. ST7, Block, Guard makes him the best LOS Big Guy I have ever seen (as long as he does not hit the ground)!
But if you use him for anything other than that the Treeman is just a useless pile of wood. You can outrunn him with EVERYTHING (exept mummies and -1mv Dwarfs)
My best friend has a pretty decent WE team and he uses his Treeman for defence only. ST7, Block, Guard makes him the best LOS Big Guy I have ever seen (as long as he does not hit the ground)!
Reason: ''
I hope you all enjoyed the crispy version of me.
- Grumbledook
- Boy Band Member
- Posts: 10713
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
- Location: London Town
- TeLef0n0
- Experienced
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:40 pm
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I like that idea. Then it will be easy to pull all players from similarly named positions. Then we can get rid of stupid names likes the ones on the High Elves...I still say that would be solved by coming out with a new title for all frenzied players (including norse blitzers).
btw... Dont change the WD, its fine as it is, and dont ever think about giving 4 WD-type players to the team...

Reason: ''
TeLef0n0 out
-
- Experienced
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:09 pm
- Location: UK
I do not think the teams are balanced. Why should Wood Elves be allowed to have a big guy while HE and DE cannot? You cannot argue that it is because of balance, because the WE roster is equal without the treeman.wesleytj wrote:no you can't take my wardancers. they are my favorite position! why does everything have to be weakened in lrb bb? leave the teams alone...they're balanced!!
Burn the treeman

Or you could just give the High Elves (and I suppose Dark Elves) a big guy...
Reason: ''
Talafar
If one piece of bad luck will lose you the game, you do not deserve to win it
If one piece of bad luck will lose you the game, you do not deserve to win it
- wesleytj
- Legend
- Posts: 3260
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 3:41 pm
- Location: Terre Haute, IN USA
- Contact:
the high and dark elf rosters were compensated for the lack of big guys with extra catchers (high elves) and extra blitzers (dark elves)...tbh i think the high and dark elves get the better end of that deal.Talafar wrote:I do not think the teams are balanced. Why should Wood Elves be allowed to have a big guy while HE and DE cannot? You cannot argue that it is because of balance, because the WE roster is equal without the treeman.wesleytj wrote:no you can't take my wardancers. they are my favorite position! why does everything have to be weakened in lrb bb? leave the teams alone...they're balanced!!
Burn the treeman![]()
Or you could just give the High Elves (and I suppose Dark Elves) a big guy...
and yes i do think they are balanced. no high and dark elves don't need big guys.
Reason: ''
____________________________________
Chinese Relativity Axiom: No matter how great your achievements, or how miserable your failures, there will always be about 1 Billion people in China who won't give a damn.
Chinese Relativity Axiom: No matter how great your achievements, or how miserable your failures, there will always be about 1 Billion people in China who won't give a damn.
- Colin
- Legend
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 2:23 am
- Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
That's the whole point of the original post. The treeman should be on the Wood Elf team just because he's a tree, but this creates a balance issue. That's why I suggested changing the overpowered wardancer (stupid name anyway) to just a blitzer with block and dodge (no leap).Talafar wrote:I do not think the teams are balanced. Why should Wood Elves be allowed to have a big guy while HE and DE cannot? You cannot argue that it is because of balance, because the WE roster is equal without the treeman.
Burn the treeman
Reason: ''
GO STAMPEDERS!
-
- Experienced
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:09 pm
- Location: UK
Fair enough Torq, but a lot of people quite like the wardancer. I think it would be far better both in "fluff" terms and game balance, to remove the Treeman. This will force the Wood Elves to play even more of a dodging game, and will fit their character better, as well as bringing them to the same level as the other elven teams.
Reason: ''
Talafar
If one piece of bad luck will lose you the game, you do not deserve to win it
If one piece of bad luck will lose you the game, you do not deserve to win it
- Thadrin
- Moaning Git
- Posts: 8079
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Norsca
- Contact:
I would like to do away with NEARLY all the WFB names. Trollslayers and Witch Elves would stay because I can't come up with a suitable 2nd ed. style position namefor them, but they do fit on the teams.
Runners should stay Runners. I wouldn't mind switching Pass for Sure Hands on the DE throwers and renaming them runners...but thats a small change. Ghouls could be Runners too, or possibly catchers. The title of runner should exist to cover the races who have these hybrid thrower-catcher players or just to reflect how the players should fluffwise be used.
I don't agree with any change to the Wood Elf Blitzer (
) even though I hate them with a passion.
Runners should stay Runners. I wouldn't mind switching Pass for Sure Hands on the DE throwers and renaming them runners...but thats a small change. Ghouls could be Runners too, or possibly catchers. The title of runner should exist to cover the races who have these hybrid thrower-catcher players or just to reflect how the players should fluffwise be used.
I don't agree with any change to the Wood Elf Blitzer (

Reason: ''
I know a bear that you don't know. * ICEPELT IS MY HERO.
Master bleater. * Not in the clique.
Member of the "3 digit" club.
Master bleater. * Not in the clique.
Member of the "3 digit" club.
- Colin
- Legend
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 2:23 am
- Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
Changing the WE blitzers
was just an idea thrown out there, never expect it to happen. Just making the observation that the only reason they have leap is to fit the WFB fluff on wardancers. Anyway, good to see someone else is behind getting rid of the WFB inspired names (and I don't have any problem with anything you suggested). As far as frenzied players (TS, WitchElf), the suggestion of having a position called Berserker isn't all that bad (I guess Norse blitzers would then be more accurately called Norse Berserkers).

Reason: ''
GO STAMPEDERS!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 3365
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2002 7:01 am
- Location: Finland, Oulu
Or, to give the wood elves one of the best blitzers in the game as a unique team feature.Torg wrote:Changing the WE blitzerswas just an idea thrown out there, never expect it to happen. Just making the observation that the only reason they have leap is to fit the WFB fluff on wardancers.
I'm sorry that I have to say this but it would be extremely boring if the difference between high elf and wood elf blitzers would be only that High elves have AV8 and wood elves MA8 and dodge.
By all means, call them blitzers (I'm all for that change too) but let them keep leap and stay as they are.
Reason: ''
[url=http://www.talkbloodbowl.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3460]-[/url]Teemu
[i][size=67]Don't lynch me! I'm the captain of the carpet ship![/size][/i]
[i][size=67]Don't lynch me! I'm the captain of the carpet ship![/size][/i]
- Darkson
- Da Spammer
- Posts: 24047
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 9:04 pm
- Location: The frozen ruins of Felstad
- Contact:
I'd like to see all the WFB removed from BB, and go back to Blitzer, Blocker, etc, with the addition of runner. TBH, having not faced a HE team regularly, and not playing WFB, I can't remember the names of the HE players, yet I have no trouble with the players in a DE team, who have the same stat line. Go figure 

Reason: ''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 3365
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2002 7:01 am
- Location: Finland, Oulu
And just to confirm that no-one got a wrong impression: I definitely belong to the group of people who want to get the WHFB names removed from BB.
Slayers and witch elves could be Berserkers in my opinion.
Slayers and witch elves could be Berserkers in my opinion.
Reason: ''
[url=http://www.talkbloodbowl.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3460]-[/url]Teemu
[i][size=67]Don't lynch me! I'm the captain of the carpet ship![/size][/i]
[i][size=67]Don't lynch me! I'm the captain of the carpet ship![/size][/i]
- Colin
- Legend
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 2:23 am
- Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
I will concede to the majority, just change the names and keep the stats as they are, can we all agree on this (other than Wes, the WFB whore - this is meant to be a joke so don't take it personally)? With the new minis going back to the 2ed cyber fantasy style, I think that if we had a set of titles that were similar title as 2ed it would add more clearity to the game. The titles I would suggest (from what was stated in this thread);
Lineman (basic stats and no starting skills GEN access), Catcher (catch and/or dodge AG), Thrower (Pass with or without surehands PA), Runner (surehands PA), Blitzer (block and/or surefeet ST), Blocker (most BGs and those who start with higher than average ST and or thick skull ST), Berserker (frenzy and/or jump up ST).
From this we can see that pretty much all positions can fit into these basic titles, of course some existing positions with change in terms of title. Dwarf Longbeards have the same stats and skills as the CD blockers and thus should be called Dwarf Blockers (not linemen), hobgobs would be the "lineman" position on the CD team and witch elf, slayers, Norse blitzers would become Berserkers, BCs would be (rightfully) blitzers.
Lineman (basic stats and no starting skills GEN access), Catcher (catch and/or dodge AG), Thrower (Pass with or without surehands PA), Runner (surehands PA), Blitzer (block and/or surefeet ST), Blocker (most BGs and those who start with higher than average ST and or thick skull ST), Berserker (frenzy and/or jump up ST).
From this we can see that pretty much all positions can fit into these basic titles, of course some existing positions with change in terms of title. Dwarf Longbeards have the same stats and skills as the CD blockers and thus should be called Dwarf Blockers (not linemen), hobgobs would be the "lineman" position on the CD team and witch elf, slayers, Norse blitzers would become Berserkers, BCs would be (rightfully) blitzers.
Reason: ''
GO STAMPEDERS!
- Darkson
- Da Spammer
- Posts: 24047
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 9:04 pm
- Location: The frozen ruins of Felstad
- Contact:
So the Norse team would be:-
0-2 Catchers
0-2 Throwers
0-4 Berserkers
0-12 Blitzers (well, they start with Block
)
0-2 Catchers
0-2 Throwers
0-4 Berserkers
0-12 Blitzers (well, they start with Block


Reason: ''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
- Sushé Wakka
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:41 pm
- Location: Ogrobe, Galicia, Spain
I still don't understand why you hate WFB names so much. It must be a veterans' thing (I'm calling "veternas" to the guys who started on the 2nd or 1st ed. as opposed to me and many others who started with the 3rd ed.). Or, it may be that I got started with WFB and then went to Blood Bowl. I feel comfortable with WFB based names and I feel no need to changing them.
And returning to the starting topic, I don't care if the Wardancer (it is shorter than Wood Elf blitzer) loses leap or not. Either way, elves will still suck (It has nothing to do with game balance or anything- it is just my healthy and senseless hate to all of those pointy eared scum).
And returning to the starting topic, I don't care if the Wardancer (it is shorter than Wood Elf blitzer) loses leap or not. Either way, elves will still suck (It has nothing to do with game balance or anything- it is just my healthy and senseless hate to all of those pointy eared scum).
Reason: ''
Sushé, the elfhater