Non WFB fluff Woodies

For Fantasy Football related chat that doesn't come under any of other forum categories.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Robotorz
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 603
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2003 9:11 pm
Location: C8P

Post by Robotorz »

I think the only thing the treeman does is save some elves from dying (and save them some turn from dodging away from Krox and stuff like that)
But if you use him for anything other than that the Treeman is just a useless pile of wood. You can outrunn him with EVERYTHING (exept mummies and -1mv Dwarfs)
My best friend has a pretty decent WE team and he uses his Treeman for defence only. ST7, Block, Guard makes him the best LOS Big Guy I have ever seen (as long as he does not hit the ground)!

Reason: ''
I hope you all enjoyed the crispy version of me.
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Post by Grumbledook »

yer but blood bowl is now under the wing of fantatic and they can do as they please and the blood bowl fans want it as blood bowl not a feeder for warhammer (which it can still do)

Reason: ''
User avatar
TeLef0n0
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:40 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Post by TeLef0n0 »

I still say that would be solved by coming out with a new title for all frenzied players (including norse blitzers).
I like that idea. Then it will be easy to pull all players from similarly named positions. Then we can get rid of stupid names likes the ones on the High Elves...

btw... Dont change the WD, its fine as it is, and dont ever think about giving 4 WD-type players to the team... :o

Reason: ''
TeLef0n0 out
Talafar
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:09 pm
Location: UK

Post by Talafar »

wesleytj wrote:no you can't take my wardancers. they are my favorite position! why does everything have to be weakened in lrb bb? leave the teams alone...they're balanced!!

:pissed:
I do not think the teams are balanced. Why should Wood Elves be allowed to have a big guy while HE and DE cannot? You cannot argue that it is because of balance, because the WE roster is equal without the treeman.
Burn the treeman :wink:
Or you could just give the High Elves (and I suppose Dark Elves) a big guy...

Reason: ''
Talafar

If one piece of bad luck will lose you the game, you do not deserve to win it
User avatar
wesleytj
Legend
Legend
Posts: 3260
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 3:41 pm
Location: Terre Haute, IN USA
Contact:

Post by wesleytj »

Talafar wrote:
wesleytj wrote:no you can't take my wardancers. they are my favorite position! why does everything have to be weakened in lrb bb? leave the teams alone...they're balanced!!

:pissed:
I do not think the teams are balanced. Why should Wood Elves be allowed to have a big guy while HE and DE cannot? You cannot argue that it is because of balance, because the WE roster is equal without the treeman.
Burn the treeman :wink:
Or you could just give the High Elves (and I suppose Dark Elves) a big guy...
the high and dark elf rosters were compensated for the lack of big guys with extra catchers (high elves) and extra blitzers (dark elves)...tbh i think the high and dark elves get the better end of that deal.

and yes i do think they are balanced. no high and dark elves don't need big guys.

Reason: ''
____________________________________
Chinese Relativity Axiom: No matter how great your achievements, or how miserable your failures, there will always be about 1 Billion people in China who won't give a damn.
User avatar
Colin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5542
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 2:23 am
Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada

Post by Colin »

Talafar wrote:I do not think the teams are balanced. Why should Wood Elves be allowed to have a big guy while HE and DE cannot? You cannot argue that it is because of balance, because the WE roster is equal without the treeman.
Burn the treeman
That's the whole point of the original post. The treeman should be on the Wood Elf team just because he's a tree, but this creates a balance issue. That's why I suggested changing the overpowered wardancer (stupid name anyway) to just a blitzer with block and dodge (no leap).

Reason: ''
GO STAMPEDERS!
Talafar
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 9:09 pm
Location: UK

Post by Talafar »

Fair enough Torq, but a lot of people quite like the wardancer. I think it would be far better both in "fluff" terms and game balance, to remove the Treeman. This will force the Wood Elves to play even more of a dodging game, and will fit their character better, as well as bringing them to the same level as the other elven teams.

Reason: ''
Talafar

If one piece of bad luck will lose you the game, you do not deserve to win it
User avatar
Thadrin
Moaning Git
Posts: 8079
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Norsca
Contact:

Post by Thadrin »

I would like to do away with NEARLY all the WFB names. Trollslayers and Witch Elves would stay because I can't come up with a suitable 2nd ed. style position namefor them, but they do fit on the teams.

Runners should stay Runners. I wouldn't mind switching Pass for Sure Hands on the DE throwers and renaming them runners...but thats a small change. Ghouls could be Runners too, or possibly catchers. The title of runner should exist to cover the races who have these hybrid thrower-catcher players or just to reflect how the players should fluffwise be used.

I don't agree with any change to the Wood Elf Blitzer ( :wink: ) even though I hate them with a passion.

Reason: ''
I know a bear that you don't know. * ICEPELT IS MY HERO.
Master bleater. * Not in the clique.
Member of the "3 digit" club.
User avatar
Colin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5542
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 2:23 am
Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada

Post by Colin »

Changing the WE blitzers :wink: was just an idea thrown out there, never expect it to happen. Just making the observation that the only reason they have leap is to fit the WFB fluff on wardancers. Anyway, good to see someone else is behind getting rid of the WFB inspired names (and I don't have any problem with anything you suggested). As far as frenzied players (TS, WitchElf), the suggestion of having a position called Berserker isn't all that bad (I guess Norse blitzers would then be more accurately called Norse Berserkers).

Reason: ''
GO STAMPEDERS!
Mestari
Legend
Legend
Posts: 3365
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2002 7:01 am
Location: Finland, Oulu

Post by Mestari »

Torg wrote:Changing the WE blitzers :wink: was just an idea thrown out there, never expect it to happen. Just making the observation that the only reason they have leap is to fit the WFB fluff on wardancers.
Or, to give the wood elves one of the best blitzers in the game as a unique team feature.
I'm sorry that I have to say this but it would be extremely boring if the difference between high elf and wood elf blitzers would be only that High elves have AV8 and wood elves MA8 and dodge.

By all means, call them blitzers (I'm all for that change too) but let them keep leap and stay as they are.

Reason: ''
[url=http://www.talkbloodbowl.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3460]-[/url]Teemu
[i][size=67]Don't lynch me! I'm the captain of the carpet ship![/size][/i]
User avatar
Darkson
Da Spammer
Posts: 24047
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 9:04 pm
Location: The frozen ruins of Felstad
Contact:

Post by Darkson »

I'd like to see all the WFB removed from BB, and go back to Blitzer, Blocker, etc, with the addition of runner. TBH, having not faced a HE team regularly, and not playing WFB, I can't remember the names of the HE players, yet I have no trouble with the players in a DE team, who have the same stat line. Go figure :wink:

Reason: ''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
Mestari
Legend
Legend
Posts: 3365
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2002 7:01 am
Location: Finland, Oulu

Post by Mestari »

And just to confirm that no-one got a wrong impression: I definitely belong to the group of people who want to get the WHFB names removed from BB.
Slayers and witch elves could be Berserkers in my opinion.

Reason: ''
[url=http://www.talkbloodbowl.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3460]-[/url]Teemu
[i][size=67]Don't lynch me! I'm the captain of the carpet ship![/size][/i]
User avatar
Colin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5542
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 2:23 am
Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada

Post by Colin »

I will concede to the majority, just change the names and keep the stats as they are, can we all agree on this (other than Wes, the WFB whore - this is meant to be a joke so don't take it personally)? With the new minis going back to the 2ed cyber fantasy style, I think that if we had a set of titles that were similar title as 2ed it would add more clearity to the game. The titles I would suggest (from what was stated in this thread);

Lineman (basic stats and no starting skills GEN access), Catcher (catch and/or dodge AG), Thrower (Pass with or without surehands PA), Runner (surehands PA), Blitzer (block and/or surefeet ST), Blocker (most BGs and those who start with higher than average ST and or thick skull ST), Berserker (frenzy and/or jump up ST).

From this we can see that pretty much all positions can fit into these basic titles, of course some existing positions with change in terms of title. Dwarf Longbeards have the same stats and skills as the CD blockers and thus should be called Dwarf Blockers (not linemen), hobgobs would be the "lineman" position on the CD team and witch elf, slayers, Norse blitzers would become Berserkers, BCs would be (rightfully) blitzers.

Reason: ''
GO STAMPEDERS!
User avatar
Darkson
Da Spammer
Posts: 24047
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 9:04 pm
Location: The frozen ruins of Felstad
Contact:

Post by Darkson »

So the Norse team would be:-

0-2 Catchers
0-2 Throwers
0-4 Berserkers
0-12 Blitzers (well, they start with Block :wink: :lol: )

Reason: ''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
User avatar
Sushé Wakka
Emerging Star
Emerging Star
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:41 pm
Location: Ogrobe, Galicia, Spain

Post by Sushé Wakka »

I still don't understand why you hate WFB names so much. It must be a veterans' thing (I'm calling "veternas" to the guys who started on the 2nd or 1st ed. as opposed to me and many others who started with the 3rd ed.). Or, it may be that I got started with WFB and then went to Blood Bowl. I feel comfortable with WFB based names and I feel no need to changing them.
And returning to the starting topic, I don't care if the Wardancer (it is shorter than Wood Elf blitzer) loses leap or not. Either way, elves will still suck (It has nothing to do with game balance or anything- it is just my healthy and senseless hate to all of those pointy eared scum).

Reason: ''
Sushé, the elfhater
Post Reply