IV. Dungeon Bowl + results

Frank · Post by **Frank** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:28 am

Tim wrote:
lucifer wrote:See you all back there next year and hopefully we might even spot a German in the bar after 10pm....powergamers
Bah, we only left around 23h

Well - that's 10pm on his clock...

Tim · Post by **Tim** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:03 pm

true

traveller · Post by **traveller** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:13 pm

Uff, just added about 100 of my picts into the tournament section of my website. (just press the www button below!

) Enjoy !

Traveller

Banelord · Post by **Banelord** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:20 am

Amazing tournament and a big thank you to Sascha and his team. From my point of view it was a nearly perfect organization. Only the long break after game 6 was annoying. I had some very interesting games, e.g. Floridaboy (DB-winner '04 and '05), Indigo (who deserved the most-sporting-award) and of course BÃ¤rbel.

The dungeon (i love this dungeon, the creators have done a great job!) was very hard for dwarfs with approximately 24x33 fields. And especially when BÃ¤rbel found the ball in turn two

. But an annoying blitzer

, her early (and from my point of view unnecessary) usage of the re-rolls

and a little bit bad luck (risky gfi)

, gave me the chance to take over the ball.

At least there was one game-winning aspekt for the dwarfs: Slayer! Pushing 3 saurus and 1 skink into the lava and making 1 cas was a big advantage. BÃ¤rbel played a fast and straight game after finding the ball, but losing so much players because of my slayers "broke her the neck" after losing the ball.

@Mootaz

And BÃ¤rbel would have won the whole thing, but her Skink had to roll a 1 on the crucial GFI and broke its neck

If the GFI had worked, she would have been out of reach of the Dwarves and would have scored an easy TD.

That's not right, one of my blitzers would have been in Blitz-range, but with two go-for-it's.

And a push would have been a touchdown for BÃ¤rbel!

So it was her great chance, but not a safe one.

@lucifer

Thank you. I had hoped to play against you and taking "revenge" for my brother (Girathon, amazon player last year) but maybe next year.

Cheeky Berlin · Post by **Cheeky Berlin** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 5:50 pm

The Games =

The Players =

Location, organisation and food =

Finalrankinig with imbalanced sportsmanship =

Sharky2k · Post by **Sharky2k** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:37 pm

Cheeky Berlin wrote: Finalrankinig with "unfair" sportsmanship =

hmm i think its more imbalanced then unfair

you will get to much points for this.
in my opinion this award is not necassary because we are all sportsman.

Indigo · Post by **Indigo** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:49 am

Personally I think the sportsmanship was AWESOME this year

But seriously, I think that the general tournament scene is made up of good sports. However, the majors are different - they attract a lot of people who may not be as familiar with "accepted" standards of sportsmanship. Maybe then it makes some sense to have sportsmanship affect the final standings?

I agree though, there's no way I should be placed 2nd with a 3-2-1 record...

Podfrey · Post by **Podfrey** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:26 am

Indigo wrote:I agree though, there's no way I should be placed 2nd with a 3-2-1 record...

I'd second that with a similar 3-2-1 record and a 30-odd placed finish.

Cheeky Berlin · Post by **Cheeky Berlin** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:44 pm

@Sharky2k
OK imbalanced.

UtakHai · Post by **UtakHai** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:24 am

Any idea when the results will have found their way into the NAF rankings?
I know there where a lot of new NAF members and games to be entered, so
Iam just curious.

Tim · Post by **Tim** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:26 pm

I'll do it this week. Everything's ready, i'm just waiting for feedback from some new signups ...

Lycos · Post by **Lycos** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:13 pm

Tim, do you want my help? I know have offered already, but if you need help Im here........

Mad Mike · Post by **Mad Mike** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:51 pm

Tim wrote:I'll do it this week. Everything's ready, i'm just waiting for feedback from some new signups ...

Hey Tim, the week is nearly over but nothing happend

If you need any help - please ask for it! It es very unpleasant to wait more than 3 weeks for the changes in the NAF rankings.

Tim · Post by **Tim** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:51 pm

What ever happened to the thing called patience?

Mad Mike · Post by **Mad Mike** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:39 pm

Patience - do you mean that Guns N' Roses song?

Sorry Tim, I didn't want to be rude. But in my opinion the NAF ranking is part of a tournament. Waiting for the changes in the rankings for weeks is not the best publicity for the tournament. And to be earnest, I don't like waiting for so long